Skip to main contentSkip to navigation
Skip to main content

Use Cases

Pick an issue. Pick a department. Pick the software. Each use case shows one AI solution to accelerate your business.

Select

Showing 50 use cases

  • FOUNDATION

    Poor quality leads and messy CRM data slow growth

    Inbound leads land in the CRM clean, enriched, and routed fast.

    Problem to Solve
    • Leads arrive with missing fields and duplicates
    • Routing rules stay inconsistent across reps
    • Slow response time lowers conversion
    What You Get
    • Target list built from clear ICP rules
    • Enriched contacts in the CRM with duplicate checks
    • Outreach drafts based on approved templates
    • Reply routing to the right rep, with alerts
    Before
    • Leads land across forms and inboxes
    • Manual entry creates missing fields and duplicates
    • Ownership stays unclear, follow-up starts late
    After
    • Leads land in CRM in one format
    • Duplicates flagged, enrichment fills key fields
    • Owner assigned fast, alerts trigger follow-up
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Calling within 5 minutes instead of 30 minutes raises odds of contacting a lead by 100x.
    • Calling within 5 minutes instead of 30 minutes raises odds of a lead entering the sales cycle by 21x.
  • FOUNDATION

    Follow-ups slip after meetings, deals slow down

    Notes turn into tasks and follow-ups the same day.

    Problem to Solve
    • Notes stay trapped in docs
    • Owners and due dates stay unclear
    • Follow-ups go out late or never
    What You Get
    • Task list with owners and due dates
    • Follow-up email draft for each meeting
    • CRM or project updates from action items
    • Weekly rollup of open commitments
    Before
    • Notes stored in docs with no task conversion
    • Action items missed or assigned late
    • Follow-up depends on memory
    After
    • Tasks created from notes with owners and due dates
    • Follow-up drafted the same day
    • Status updated in tracker or CRM
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Faster follow-up after meetings
    • Fewer dropped action items
  • FOUNDATION

    Proposals take too long to send, deals stall

    Proposals assemble from approved blocks with fewer rewrites.

    Problem to Solve
    • Drafting repeats the same content
    • Scope and pricing details get missed
    • Approval cycles slow sending
    What You Get
    • Draft proposal built from your templates
    • Auto-filled scope based on intake answers
    • Internal review checklist before sending
    • Version history and approval notes
    Before
    • Reps rebuild proposals from old docs
    • Scope and terms vary by rep
    • Approvals happen in email threads
    After
    • Proposal drafts from approved templates
    • Standard terms and scope blocks
    • Review step before sending
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Faster proposal turnaround
    • More consistent scope and terms
  • FOUNDATION

    Invoices go out late or wrong, cash flow suffers

    Approved work turns into invoices with fewer mistakes.

    Problem to Solve
    • Billing details live across tools
    • Manual invoice creation creates errors
    • Delays push cash collection out
    What You Get
    • Invoice draft from approved work logs
    • Line items mapped to the right customer
    • Human approval before sending
    • Invoice log with status tracking
    Before
    • Invoices created by hand from notes
    • Line items missed or mispriced
    • Finance chases approvals for billing
    After
    • Invoices drafted from approved work
    • Validation checks for totals and customer
    • Approval gate before send
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Faster invoice turnaround
    • Fewer invoice errors and rework
  • FOUNDATION

    Late payments hurt cash flow and planning

    Collections follow-ups run on a clear schedule with escalation.

    Problem to Solve
    • Overdue invoices slip without follow-up
    • Messaging varies by person
    • Escalation happens too late
    What You Get
    • Reminder sequence by aging bucket
    • Polite follow-up drafts with invoice links
    • Escalation rules for high-risk accounts
    • Collections dashboard and notes
    Before
    • Finance sends reminders manually
    • Overdue lists updated by hand
    • Escalations happen after weeks
    After
    • Follow-ups scheduled by rules
    • Overdue list stays current
    • Escalations trigger on thresholds
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • More consistent follow-up on overdue invoices
    • Fewer missed collections touches
  • FOUNDATION

    Support backlog grows and response slows

    Tickets triage fast, route to the right owner, and get resolved sooner.

    Problem to Solve
    • Urgent tickets hide in the queue
    • Wrong routing wastes time
    • Backlog grows while customers wait
    What You Get
    • Auto-tagging by topic and urgency
    • Routing rules by product and team
    • Escalation alerts for high-risk tickets
    • Daily triage digest for leads
    Before
    • Tickets sorted by hand
    • Routing depends on tribal knowledge
    • Escalations discovered late
    After
    • Tags and priority applied on intake
    • Tickets routed to the right queue
    • Alerts fire before SLA risk
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Intercom reports Fin resolves 41% of customer conversations on average.
    • Lower backlog as routine questions get handled automatically.
  • FOUNDATION

    Support repeats the same answers, costs rise

    Resolved tickets turn into published help articles.

    Problem to Solve
    • Tribal knowledge stays in tickets
    • New agents ask the same questions
    • Customers repeat the same issues
    What You Get
    • Draft article from resolved ticket patterns
    • Screenshots and steps pulled into a template
    • Review step before publishing
    • Article update suggestions from new tickets
    Before
    • Answers live in agent replies
    • Docs lag behind product changes
    • Customers open repeat tickets
    After
    • Articles drafted from real resolutions
    • Review and publish workflow
    • Deflection improves over time
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • More self-serve answers for customers
    • Lower repeat ticket volume over time
  • FOUNDATION

    Leaders lack clear weekly numbers, decisions slip

    A weekly KPI pack ships on schedule with highlights and risks.

    Problem to Solve
    • Reporting pulls take too long
    • Numbers vary by owner and format
    • Risks show up late
    What You Get
    • Weekly KPI doc or slide pack
    • Variance notes and trend callouts
    • Action list for owners
    • Distribution to the right channel
    Before
    • Analysts compile data by hand
    • Metrics live in many sheets
    • Stakeholders wait for updates
    After
    • Data pulls run on schedule
    • Pack follows one template
    • Owners get clear actions
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Faster weekly reporting cycle
    • Clearer visibility into trends and risks
  • FOUNDATION

    Approvals stall work, projects drift

    Approval requests route fast with reminders and audit trail.

    Problem to Solve
    • Approvals sit in inboxes
    • Work stalls while teams wait
    • No visibility on who blocks progress
    What You Get
    • Approval request built from a standard form
    • Routing to the right approver
    • Reminder and escalation schedule
    • Approval log for audit and reporting
    Before
    • Approval requests scattered across email and chat
    • Approver unclear, no SLA for decisions
    • Teams chase approvals manually
    After
    • Approvals routed to the right approver
    • Reminders and escalation keep work moving
    • Audit trail shows who approved and when
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Shorter approval cycle times
    • Fewer stalled projects from missed approvals
  • FOUNDATION

    New hires start without access, ramp slows

    Onboarding steps run from a checklist with routed access requests.

    Problem to Solve
    • Onboarding steps get missed
    • Access requests stay untracked
    • Managers chase setup across teams
    What You Get
    • Role-based onboarding checklist
    • Access requests routed to owners
    • Reminder schedule for overdue steps
    • Onboarding status view for managers
    Before
    • Manual checklist in email or docs
    • Access requests sent one by one
    • New hires wait for basics
    After
    • Checklist starts from role and start date
    • Requests routed with owners and deadlines
    • Status visible for all stakeholders
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Faster ramp for new hires
    • Fewer missed onboarding steps
  • FOUNDATION

    Vendor onboarding drags and risk stays unclear

    Vendor intake runs on a standard flow with tracked review.

    Problem to Solve
    • Risk questionnaires take too long
    • Missing info causes back-and-forth
    • Approvals lack traceability
    What You Get
    • Standard intake form and required fields
    • Auto-extraction into a review table
    • Flagged risk answers for human review
    • Approval log and renewal reminders
    Before
    • Questionnaires handled over email
    • Answers copied into sheets by hand
    • Risk review delayed by missing details
    After
    • Intake standardized and validated
    • Answers extracted and flagged
    • Review routed with clear owners
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Faster vendor onboarding
    • Clearer vendor risk visibility
  • FOUNDATION

    Manual data entry creates errors and delays

    Docs get captured, extracted, and validated before downstream steps.

    Problem to Solve
    • Teams retype data from PDFs and forms
    • Errors create rework and delays
    • Validation happens too late
    What You Get
    • Document upload intake with required fields
    • Field extraction into a table
    • Validation checks and exception queue
    • Human review step for flagged items
    Before
    • Docs stored in folders with no structured capture
    • Manual extraction into spreadsheets
    • Errors found downstream
    After
    • Docs flow into a structured intake
    • Extraction fills the right fields
    • Exceptions flagged for review
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Lower error rates from validated extraction
    • Faster processing of inbound documents
  • GROWTH

    Reps chase the wrong leads, pipeline quality drops

    Scores route leads fast and focus reps on best-fit buyers.

    Problem to Solve
    • Reps waste time on low-intent leads
    • High-intent leads wait too long
    • Prioritization varies by rep
    What You Get
    • Lead score based on form and CRM signals
    • Routing rules based on score and region
    • Alerts for high-intent leads
    • Score explanation for rep trust
    Before
    • First-come lead handling
    • Manual scoring varies by rep
    • Pipeline fills with low-fit leads
    After
    • Lead score drives routing and speed-to-lead
    • High-intent leads trigger alerts and tasks
    • Reps focus time on highest fit leads
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Improved lead quality and conversion rates
    • Faster speed-to-lead for high-intent buyers
  • GROWTH

    Reps show up unprepared, calls miss key context

    A one-page brief arrives before each call with key signals.

    Problem to Solve
    • Research time eats selling time
    • Key risks and opportunities get missed
    • Prep varies across reps
    What You Get
    • One-page account brief per meeting
    • Key contacts and recent activity summary
    • Talk track suggestions and objections
    • Next steps and follow-up prompts
    Before
    • Reps research accounts one by one
    • Notes scattered across tools
    • Calls start without a plan
    After
    • Brief generated from CRM and web signals
    • Consistent prep format across reps
    • Follow-up steps clear after the call
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • More consistent call preparation
    • Less time spent on manual research
  • GROWTH

    Deals slip and risk shows up late, forecasts break

    Risk signals get flagged early with a mitigation plan.

    Problem to Solve
    • Risk signals hide in notes and inboxes
    • Forecast misses reality until late
    • Managers chase status instead of coaching
    What You Get
    • Risk detection rules for common patterns
    • Daily or weekly risk digest
    • Suggested next steps per deal
    • Escalation alerts for high-value deals
    Before
    • Risk discovered during forecast calls
    • Signals spread across notes and email
    • Surprises show up late in the quarter
    After
    • Signals detected and summarized
    • Alerts trigger mitigation tasks
    • Fewer late surprises and clearer forecast
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Earlier visibility into at-risk deals
    • More stable forecasting and coaching focus
  • GROWTH

    AP processing stays slow and costly, exceptions pile up

    Invoices route fast with coding suggestions and flagged exceptions.

    Problem to Solve
    • Invoices arrive in many formats
    • Coding and approvals take time
    • Exceptions hide until payment is late
    What You Get
    • Invoice capture and extraction
    • Suggested coding and GL mapping
    • Exception flags for outliers
    • Approval workflow with audit trail
    Before
    • Invoices received via email and PDFs
    • AP codes line items manually
    • Exceptions found after review delays
    After
    • Invoices extracted into structured fields
    • Suggested codes speed review
    • Exceptions routed to a queue
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • A UiPath bot program reduced invoice processing times by 92% in a Jade Global case study.
    • The same case study reports more than 2,700 hours saved annually.
  • GROWTH

    Month-end close feels chaotic, surprises hit late

    Close steps run from one checklist with variance explanations.

    Problem to Solve
    • Close tasks get missed or delayed
    • Variance review takes too long
    • Teams lack a shared close view
    What You Get
    • Month-end checklist with owners and due dates
    • Variance notes drafted from data
    • Exception flags for unusual movements
    • Daily close status digest
    Before
    • Close tracked in spreadsheets and email
    • Owners update status manually
    • Variances explained late
    After
    • Checklist runs from a single system
    • Status updates auto-roll into a view
    • Variances summarized for review
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Fewer missed close steps
    • Faster variance review and sign-off
  • GROWTH

    Hiring screening takes too long, strong candidates wait

    Resumes score against a rubric with a human review step.

    Problem to Solve
    • Resume review eats recruiter time
    • Screening criteria varies by reviewer
    • Strong candidates wait too long
    What You Get
    • Rubric score and summary per candidate
    • Shortlist recommendations by role
    • Flagged risks for human review
    • Consistent notes for interviewers
    Before
    • Manual reading of resumes
    • Notes vary and decisions feel subjective
    • Shortlist built late
    After
    • Rubric score and summary per candidate
    • Consistent criteria across reviewers
    • Shortlist ready faster with human review
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Faster screening cycle
    • More consistent candidate evaluation
  • GROWTH

    Policy answers vary and create risk, teams lose trust

    A policy assistant answers with citations from approved docs.

    Problem to Solve
    • Employees ask the same policy questions
    • Answers vary by person
    • Incorrect guidance creates risk
    What You Get
    • Policy assistant grounded in your docs
    • Cited answers with source links
    • Escalation to HR for edge cases
    • Weekly report of top questions
    Before
    • Questions answered in chat and email
    • HR repeats the same replies
    • No single source of truth
    After
    • Answers come from approved documents
    • Citations build trust
    • HR focuses on exceptions
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Fewer repeated HR questions
    • More consistent policy guidance with citations
  • GROWTH

    Work stays tribal knowledge, quality varies by person

    Screen recordings turn into SOPs with checklists and review.

    Problem to Solve
    • Work stays tribal knowledge
    • Training takes too long
    • Quality varies by person
    What You Get
    • SOP draft in a standard template
    • Checklist steps and screenshots
    • Owner review before publishing
    • Update prompts when steps change
    Before
    • Shadowing and ad hoc training
    • Steps live in chat and memory
    • Errors rise during handoffs
    After
    • SOP drafted from recordings and notes
    • Checklist format with clear steps
    • Review and publish keeps SOP current
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Faster onboarding for repeat workflows
    • More consistent execution across the team
  • GROWTH

    Work stuck, customers wait, no owner

    Stalls trigger a workflow that gathers missing info and routes next steps.

    Problem to Solve
    • Orders stall from missing info
    • No clear owner for next step
    • Escalations reach customers first
    What You Get
    • Stall detection rules and triggers
    • Missing info request messages
    • Routing to the right owner
    • Escalation rules and SLA tracking
    Before
    • Stalls discovered late
    • Back-and-forth to gather missing info
    • Manual chasing across teams
    After
    • Stall triggers detect issues early
    • Missing info requested automatically
    • Routing and escalation assign next owner
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Fewer stalled orders and requests
    • Clear ownership and faster resolution
  • GROWTH

    Support replies take too long, customers churn

    Agents send faster replies with policy citations and review.

    Problem to Solve
    • Agents rewrite the same answers
    • Policy misses create rework
    • Response time hurts customer experience
    What You Get
    • Draft reply from ticket context
    • Inline policy citations and links
    • Human approval before sending
    • Suggested follow-up questions
    Before
    • Agents search docs for answers
    • Replies vary by agent
    • Long handle time per ticket
    After
    • Draft replies with cited sources
    • Fewer back-and-forth messages
    • More consistent tone and policy use
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Microsoft reports a 12% reduction in average handle time in early Copilot for Service deployments.
    • Faster first response and more consistent answers with policy citations.
  • GROWTH

    SLA breaches and escalations surprise leaders, trust drops

    Risk signals get flagged early with alerts and routing.

    Problem to Solve
    • SLA breaches surprise leaders
    • Urgent tickets hide in the queue
    • Escalations happen late
    What You Get
    • SLA risk scoring and alerts
    • Escalation routing rules
    • Leader digest for at-risk queues
    • Post-mortem notes for repeat issues
    Before
    • Escalations discovered late
    • Priority set by gut feel
    • Leaders learn after breach
    After
    • Risk signals flagged early
    • Alerts route work to the right responder
    • Preventable breaches drop over time
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Lower SLA breach rates over time
    • Fewer surprise escalations
  • TRANSFORM

    Clients keep asking for status, delivery time disappears

    Structured updates power a portal view with fewer meetings.

    Problem to Solve
    • Clients ask for status every week
    • PMs rebuild updates in slides
    • Delivery time gets eaten by reporting
    What You Get
    • Status update template and rules
    • Portal view powered by structured fields
    • Client-ready summaries on schedule
    • Escalation visibility for blockers
    Before
    • Manual status updates in email and decks
    • Inconsistent format across projects
    • Clients ping repeatedly for the same info
    After
    • Structured updates feed a portal view
    • Consistent format across projects
    • Fewer status pings and clearer trust
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Fewer status meetings and pings
    • More time spent on delivery work
  • TRANSFORM

    Client onboarding drags and feels unclear, churn risk rises

    A guided assistant collects inputs, answers questions, and tracks progress.

    Problem to Solve
    • Onboarding drags with back-and-forth
    • Missing info stalls setup
    • Clients feel lost before value starts
    What You Get
    • Guided intake for required inputs
    • FAQ answers from your onboarding docs
    • Progress tracker for client and team
    • Handoff tasks to internal owners
    Before
    • Back-and-forth emails for inputs
    • Steps unclear and repeated
    • Internal teams wait on missing details
    After
    • Guided flow collects required inputs
    • Clear steps and owners for setup
    • Faster handoff and earlier time-to-value
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Shorter onboarding cycle time
    • Fewer missing inputs and handoff delays
  • TRANSFORM

    Customers disengage from generic experiences, revenue stalls

    Recommendations adapt to behavior, intent, and segment.

    Problem to Solve
    • Customers disengage from generic messaging
    • Cross-sell signals get missed
    • Manual segmentation falls behind
    What You Get
    • Recommendation rules and signals
    • Personalized messages and next steps
    • Measurement plan for impact
    • Guardrails for approved offers
    Before
    • One-size experience for all customers
    • Static segments updated by hand
    • Recommendations depend on guesswork
    After
    • Behavior signals drive recommendations
    • Next steps tailored by segment and intent
    • Results measured with simple tests
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • McKinsey reports personalization can lift revenues by 5% to 15%.
    • McKinsey reports personalization can increase marketing ROI by 10% to 30%.
  • TRANSFORM

    Internal requests interrupt real work, context switching wins

    Requests route through one intake, missing fields get collected, owners stay clear.

    Problem to Solve
    • Internal requests interrupt deep work
    • Missing details create back-and-forth
    • Requests fall through the cracks
    What You Get
    • Structured intake for common requests
    • Auto-questions to collect missing fields
    • Routing to the right owner and queue
    • Status view without extra pings
    Before
    • Ad hoc requests in chat with missing context
    • Constant pings and context switching
    • No tracking for status and ownership
    After
    • Structured intake collects required fields
    • Routing creates tasks with owners and SLAs
    • Status visible without extra pings
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Less context switching across teams
    • Fewer dropped internal requests
  • TRANSFORM

    Renewal risk shows up late, expansion moments get missed

    Signals trigger a playbook for outreach and retention.

    Problem to Solve
    • Renewal risk shows up late
    • Expansion moments get missed
    • Signals scattered across tools
    What You Get
    • Signal definitions and thresholds
    • Weekly digest for at-risk accounts
    • Recommended playbooks per signal
    • Routing to the account owner
    Before
    • Reactive account work after issues escalate
    • Signals hidden in tickets and usage
    • No consistent playbooks for outreach
    After
    • Signals trigger alerts and recommended plays
    • Weekly digest highlights at-risk accounts
    • Account team follows a repeatable plan
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Earlier renewal risk detection
    • More consistent expansion follow-up
  • TRANSFORM

    Audit prep disrupts the business, teams scramble for evidence

    Evidence collection runs from a checklist with traceability.

    Problem to Solve
    • Audit prep disrupts the team
    • Evidence lives across folders and tools
    • Missing artifacts create last-minute risk
    What You Get
    • Evidence checklist by control
    • Auto-collection prompts and routing
    • Index with links and timestamps
    • Gap flags for missing evidence
    Before
    • Manual hunting across folders and inboxes
    • Control evidence assembled late
    • Gaps discovered at the deadline
    After
    • Evidence checklist drives collection
    • Artifacts indexed with traceability
    • Gaps flagged early for fixes
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Faster audit prep with fewer fire drills
    • More complete evidence packs with traceability
  • FOUNDATION

    Slow response to inbound leads loses revenue

    Leads route to the right owner fast, with SLA reminders until first touch.

    Problem to Solve
    • Leads sit unclaimed or get routed wrong
    • No SLA visibility for first response
    • Managers learn about missed follow-up too late
    What You Get
    • Routing rules by region, product, and score
    • SLA timers with reminders and escalation
    • Auto-created tasks for first touch and next steps
    • Daily digest of unclaimed or overdue leads
    Before
    • Leads land in inboxes and forms with no owner
    • Reps follow up when they remember
    • No reporting on response time or SLA breaches
    After
    • Each lead gets an owner in minutes
    • Reminders run until first touch is logged
    • Overdue leads escalate automatically with a clear trail
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Calling within 5 minutes instead of 30 minutes raises odds of contacting a lead by 100x.
    • Calling within 5 minutes instead of 30 minutes raises odds of a lead entering the sales cycle by 21x.
  • GROWTH

    Discount approvals drag, deals stall, margins leak

    A deal desk packet builds automatically, routes for approval, and logs decisions.

    Problem to Solve
    • Reps submit incomplete discount requests
    • Approval chains differ by deal and rep
    • Policy exceptions get approved without context
    What You Get
    • Standard deal desk checklist by deal type
    • Auto-built approval packet with deal facts and rationale
    • Routing rules by discount level and risk
    • Approval log with comments and timestamps
    Before
    • Discount approvals happen in chat and email threads
    • Missing context causes back-and-forth
    • Approvals are hard to audit after the fact
    After
    • Every exception request includes the same required fields
    • Approvals route by policy with reminders
    • Decisions are searchable and reportable
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • A study cited in a CPQ paper reports a 30% to 40% reduction in quote processing time after a CPQ rollout.
    • Aberdeen research cited in a CPQ overview reports organizations saw 27% less time to produce quotes and proposals.
  • GROWTH

    Orders slow down because contract data is trapped in PDFs

    Contracts and order forms extract into structured fields with validation before fulfillment.

    Problem to Solve
    • Teams retype key fields from order forms
    • Missing fields cause rework and delays
    • Errors show up after the order is in motion
    What You Get
    • Upload and intake step with required fields
    • Auto-extracted fields into Airtable or CRM
    • Validation rules with an exception queue
    • Human review step for flagged fields
    Before
    • Contracts stored in folders and emailed around
    • Manual copy-paste into trackers
    • Errors found downstream during fulfillment or billing
    After
    • Contracts enter one intake channel
    • Key fields extracted into the right system
    • Exceptions routed for review before downstream steps
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • A UiPath case study reports mortgage document processing time dropped from 30 days to 3 days after automation.
    • Fewer data entry errors and fewer order delays.
  • GROWTH

    CRM data is messy, forecasting turns into guesswork

    An audit flags missing fields, stale stages, and risky deals, then routes fixes to owners.

    Problem to Solve
    • Key fields stay blank or inconsistent
    • Deals sit in stages with no next step
    • Managers chase updates instead of coaching
    What You Get
    • Weekly audit of required fields and stage hygiene
    • Cleanup queue by rep and manager
    • Suggested fixes and reminders
    • Dashboards for data completeness and aging
    Before
    • Ops runs manual audits in spreadsheets
    • Reps update CRM only before forecast calls
    • Bad data compounds quarter after quarter
    After
    • Hygiene checks run on a schedule
    • Fixes route to the right owner with SLAs
    • Forecast inputs get cleaner over time
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Improved data completeness and more reliable forecasting inputs.
    • Lower rework from fewer missing fields and stale stages.
  • FOUNDATION

    Escalations waste hours because the context is scattered

    Tickets summarize into a clean handoff note with next steps and links.

    Problem to Solve
    • Engineers get long ticket threads with no summary
    • Handoffs miss key details and reproduction steps
    • Customers wait while teams re-read history
    What You Get
    • One-page handoff summary with timeline and key facts
    • Repro steps and environment fields pulled forward
    • Links to related tickets and docs
    • Suggested next steps for the receiving team
    Before
    • Support pastes long threads into chat
    • Engineering re-reads the full history
    • Back-and-forth to gather basics
    After
    • Handoff note includes key details in one place
    • Receiving team starts with repro and context
    • Fewer clarification loops before work starts
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Observe.AI reports customers using its generative AI saw a 23% reduction in average handle time.
    • Faster escalations and fewer repeat questions during handoff.
  • FOUNDATION

    Status pings interrupt your team all day

    A status request form pulls the latest update and replies with one source of truth.

    Problem to Solve
    • Requests arrive in chat with missing context
    • Owners stop work to answer the same questions
    • Updates differ by person and channel
    What You Get
    • Simple status request intake (chat or form)
    • Auto-lookup of project or ticket status
    • Auto-generated reply with next milestone and owner
    • Escalation path for urgent blockers
    Before
    • People ask where this is at in chat
    • Work pauses to investigate and reply
    • Status answers vary by who responds
    After
    • Requests route through one intake
    • Replies pull from the system of record
    • Owners only get pulled in for true exceptions
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Asana reports employees spend 60% of their time on work about work like status updates and coordination.
    • Less interruption and more time on delivery work.
  • FOUNDATION

    Requests arrive in email, tasks get missed, deadlines drift

    Emails turn into structured tasks with required fields, owners, and due dates.

    Problem to Solve
    • Requests arrive with missing details
    • Manual task creation is inconsistent
    • No clear SLA for responses or completion
    What You Get
    • Email-to-task parsing with required fields
    • Auto-assign owner based on request type
    • Default due dates and SLA timers
    • Exceptions routed back for missing info
    Before
    • Requests sit in inboxes
    • People create tasks in different formats
    • Managers learn about misses too late
    After
    • Every request becomes a task with required fields
    • Owners and due dates are consistent
    • Missing info gets requested immediately
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Asana reports employees spend 60% of their time on work about work, including coordination and tracking.
    • Fewer dropped requests and faster turnaround on internal work.
  • GROWTH

    Work requests scatter across tools, no one owns the next step

    One ops hub standardizes intake, assigns owners, and tracks completion.

    Problem to Solve
    • Requests come through chat, email, and hallway conversations
    • No consistent fields for priority and due dates
    • Leaders cannot see backlog health
    What You Get
    • Standard intake form with required fields
    • Single backlog with owners and due dates
    • Routing rules and SLAs by request type
    • Weekly digest and dashboard for visibility
    Before
    • Requests live in threads and spreadsheets
    • Ownership changes without tracking
    • Backlog surprises leaders late
    After
    • Requests land in one backlog
    • Owners, SLAs, and status are visible
    • Leaders manage by data, not interruptions
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Asana reports employees spend 60% of their time on work about work, including coordination and tracking.
    • Clearer ownership and fewer dropped requests.
  • GROWTH

    Teams do the same work twice because duplicates go unnoticed

    Duplicate requests get detected early, merged, and routed to one owner.

    Problem to Solve
    • Multiple people submit the same request
    • Work starts in parallel with no coordination
    • Updates diverge and stakeholders get confused
    What You Get
    • Duplicate detection rules and similarity checks
    • Merge suggestions and consolidated thread
    • Single owner assignment and status
    • Stakeholder notifications when duplicates merge
    Before
    • Duplicates discovered after work begins
    • Multiple owners respond to the same ask
    • Time is wasted and status gets messy
    After
    • Duplicates flagged on intake
    • Work consolidates under one ticket
    • Stakeholders get one consistent update
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Asana reports employees spend 60% of their time on work about work, including coordination and tracking.
    • Less duplicated effort and fewer conflicting updates.
  • GROWTH

    Experts get pinged all day for the same internal questions

    An internal assistant answers from approved docs, with citations and escalation.

    Problem to Solve
    • Answers vary by person and channel
    • New hires do not know where to look
    • Incorrect answers create risk and rework
    What You Get
    • Assistant grounded in your approved docs
    • Answers include citations and links
    • Escalation to an owner when uncertain
    • Weekly report of top questions and doc gaps
    Before
    • Questions answered in chat and email
    • Experts repeat answers and context
    • No feedback loop to improve docs
    After
    • Answers come from a single source of truth
    • Citations build trust
    • Experts focus on edge cases
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Intercom reports Fin resolves 41% of customer conversations on average.
    • Fewer repeated questions and faster answers for employees.
  • GROWTH

    Follow-up slips, warm leads go cold, pipeline slows

    Signals trigger sequences, drafts, and handoffs so no lead gets lost.

    Problem to Solve
    • Reps forget follow-ups when workload spikes
    • Messaging varies and lacks personalization
    • Hand-off points between SDR and AE are inconsistent
    What You Get
    • Follow-up triggers from CRM and email signals
    • Drafted messages from approved templates
    • Task creation and reminders until completion
    • Escalation when a lead hits high intent
    Before
    • Follow-up depends on memory
    • Leads fall through cracks during handoffs
    • Managers lack visibility into missed touches
    After
    • Follow-up runs from triggers and SLAs
    • Messaging is consistent and personalized
    • Leaders see missed touches before leads go cold
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Microsoft reports sellers using Copilot for Sales saved an average of 90 minutes per week and 83% said it improved productivity (survey).
    • Faster speed-to-lead and more consistent follow-up.
  • GROWTH

    Bad CRM data wastes selling time and breaks reporting

    Duplicates, missing fields, and stale records get detected and routed for fixes.

    Problem to Solve
    • Duplicates inflate pipeline and activity counts
    • Missing fields break routing and reporting
    • Stale opportunities stay open without next steps
    What You Get
    • Duplicate detection and merge queue
    • Missing-field prompts and auto-enrichment suggestions
    • Stale record alerts with next-step reminders
    • Weekly hygiene scorecard by team
    Before
    • Data fixes happen only during fire drills
    • Reps spend time searching for correct records
    • Reports do not match reality
    After
    • Hygiene checks run continuously
    • Fixes route to the right owner
    • Forecast and reporting become more reliable
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Improved forecast accuracy from cleaner CRM data.
    • Less rep time spent fixing records and searching for correct info.
  • TRANSFORM

    Implementations stall, customers get frustrated, churn risk rises

    Blockers get detected early, routed to leaders, and updates draft automatically.

    Problem to Solve
    • Blockers hide in tickets, notes, and chat
    • No clear owner for removing roadblocks
    • Customers do not get proactive updates
    What You Get
    • Stall and blocker detection rules
    • Routing to the right owner with SLAs
    • Customer update drafts from the latest status
    • Leader digest for at-risk implementations
    Before
    • Blockers discovered during recurring calls
    • Updates written from scratch
    • Escalations happen after frustration builds
    After
    • Signals flag blockers early
    • Owners get tasks and escalation
    • Customers receive proactive updates
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Asana reports employees spend 60% of their time on work about work, including coordination and tracking.
    • Fewer stalled implementations and more proactive customer communication.
  • GROWTH

    QBR prep eats days, leaders still lack clear insight

    A QBR pack auto-builds with metrics, wins, risks, and next actions.

    Problem to Solve
    • Data pulls come from too many systems
    • Narratives are rebuilt from scratch each quarter
    • Action items get lost after the review
    What You Get
    • Slide or doc pack in a standard template
    • Auto-pulled KPIs and pipeline metrics
    • Wins, risks, and key deals summarized
    • Action list with owners and due dates
    Before
    • Ops teams build QBR decks manually
    • Leaders debate numbers and definitions
    • Actions are tracked inconsistently
    After
    • Pack follows one template and refreshes fast
    • Numbers are consistent and sourced
    • Actions route into task tracking automatically
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Faster QBR prep and clearer decisions from consistent metrics.
    • Less time spent rebuilding the same narrative each quarter.
  • GROWTH

    Handoffs drop context, customers repeat themselves, retention suffers

    A handoff packet captures goals, stakeholders, risks, and next steps in one place.

    Problem to Solve
    • CS starts without full context of what was sold
    • Key stakeholders and success criteria are unclear
    • Implementation risks are discovered late
    What You Get
    • Handoff packet template with required fields
    • Auto-filled deal summary and promised outcomes
    • Customer goals, stakeholders, and risks
    • Kickoff agenda and first-30-days plan draft
    Before
    • CS reads scattered notes and email threads
    • Customers repeat requirements
    • Success criteria changes mid-stream
    After
    • CS starts with a complete packet
    • Kickoff aligns on goals and plan
    • Fewer surprises during implementation
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Cleaner handoffs and less customer re-explaining during onboarding.
    • Faster time-to-value from clearer goals and ownership.
  • GROWTH

    Pricing exceptions are inconsistent, margin leakage goes unnoticed

    Exception requests gather evidence, route for approval, and log outcomes.

    Problem to Solve
    • Reps request discounts without evidence
    • Approvals depend on who is asked
    • No feedback loop from exceptions to pricing policy
    What You Get
    • Exception request form with required fields
    • Auto-collected deal data and competitive notes
    • Routing by discount level and risk
    • Exception log with outcomes and learnings
    Before
    • Discount requests happen ad hoc
    • Context is missing and approvals are slow
    • Exceptions are hard to analyze after the quarter
    After
    • Requests include required evidence
    • Approvals route by policy with SLAs
    • Exceptions become analyzable inputs to pricing strategy
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • A CPQ study reports a 30% to 40% reduction in quote processing time after CPQ implementation, helping reduce approval back-and-forth.
    • Faster exception processing and better discount governance.
  • GROWTH

    Pipeline surprises show up late, forecasts swing, leaders lose confidence

    Weekly anomaly alerts flag unusual changes and route follow-ups to owners.

    Problem to Solve
    • Stage changes happen with no notes
    • Big deal changes hide until forecast calls
    • Data anomalies distort KPIs and pipeline views
    What You Get
    • Rules for anomaly definitions by metric
    • Weekly digest of unusual changes
    • Auto-created follow-up tasks
    • Trend notes and suggested root causes
    Before
    • Anomalies found during QBRs and fire drills
    • Teams debate which numbers are real
    • Managers chase updates in meetings
    After
    • Anomalies flagged early
    • Owners get tasks to confirm and explain
    • Forecast conversations focus on actions, not data cleanup
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Earlier visibility into pipeline risks and cleaner forecasting inputs.
    • Fewer surprise swings during forecast and review cycles.
  • FOUNDATION

    Meeting scheduling friction kills momentum after a lead replies

    Replies trigger an instant booking flow with guardrails and handoff.

    Problem to Solve
    • Back-and-forth scheduling slows response
    • Wrong calendar links get sent
    • Leads go cold between reply and meeting
    What You Get
    • Auto-detected meeting intent
    • Time-window rules and meeting types
    • Calendar booking link insertion and reminders
    • Handoff to the right owner after booking
    Before
    • Reps manually send calendar links
    • Scheduling threads drag on
    • Meetings booked late or not at all
    After
    • Intent triggers a booking flow immediately
    • Rules ensure the right meeting type
    • Owners get notified as soon as a meeting is booked
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Calendly reports the average professional spends about 10 hours per week scheduling meetings.
    • Faster meeting booking and fewer scheduling back-and-forth messages.
  • GROWTH

    Reps waste selling time searching for the right asset for a deal

    An enablement assistant answers with links to approved decks, one-pagers, and proof points.

    Problem to Solve
    • Content is scattered across folders and tools
    • Reps use outdated decks
    • Enablement teams get repeated requests
    What You Get
    • Assistant grounded in your enablement library
    • Answers include links and best next asset
    • Guardrails to approved content only
    • Gap report of missing assets by theme
    Before
    • Reps search folders and ask in chat
    • Outdated materials get used
    • Enablement is reactive to requests
    After
    • Reps get the right asset in seconds
    • Approved content usage increases
    • Enablement sees gaps and demand signals
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • HubSpot cites research that salespeople spend 31% of their time searching for or creating sales content.
    • More consistent messaging and faster deal cycles from faster access to assets.
  • GROWTH

    Support volume stays high because customers cannot self-serve

    A deflection assistant answers from your KB, then escalates when needed.

    Problem to Solve
    • Customers ask the same questions repeatedly
    • Agents spend time on low-complexity issues
    • Incorrect answers create risk and churn
    What You Get
    • Assistant grounded in KB articles and macros
    • Answer citations with links
    • Escalation path to an agent when uncertain
    • Deflection reporting and top-gap insights
    Before
    • Customers open tickets for basic questions
    • Agents rewrite common replies
    • KB drifts behind real issues
    After
    • Customers get instant cited answers
    • Tickets drop for routine issues
    • KB gaps become visible and fixable
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Intercom reports Fin resolves 41% of customer conversations on average.
    • Lower support volume and faster responses for complex tickets.
  • TRANSFORM

    Customer feedback is scattered, themes get missed, roadmap drifts

    An insights agent clusters feedback, flags themes, and proposes backlog items with evidence.

    Problem to Solve
    • Feedback lives across tickets, calls, and notes
    • Manual tagging is slow and inconsistent
    • Product teams see issues too late
    What You Get
    • Theme clustering across tickets and notes
    • Top drivers and example quotes linked to sources
    • Backlog item suggestions with impact estimates
    • Weekly digest for product and CS leaders
    Before
    • Teams skim tickets manually
    • Themes debated without evidence
    • Backlog decisions lag real customer pain
    After
    • Themes surface automatically with examples
    • Leaders see what is trending early
    • Backlog items link to real customer evidence
    Outcomes / Benefits
    • Faster identification of repeat issues and clearer prioritization with linked customer evidence.
    • Less manual tagging and more consistent Voice of Customer reporting.